Marketing No Comments

Bridging in 2018

The latest data from bridging trends certainly made for interesting reading.

Mortgage delays were cited as the most popular reason for obtaining a bridging loan in Q3 this year, while average LTVs reached 49.6% during Q3 this year.

This was up from 45.4% on the previous quarter, suggesting that investor confidence in the market is stable and on a steady upward trajectory.

The fact that the average completion time on a bridging loan application in Q3 increased by four days isn’t surprising.

The summer holiday period is typically a busy time for annual leave requests and resource levels dropped as a result.

Perhaps some lenders need to think about streaming completion processes further in order to really make the most of the opportunities in the market.

Luckily, bridging finance is built on the very foundations of flexibility and speed.

Although mortgage delays have returned as the main reason for obtaining bridging finance, refurbishment follows closely behind, highlighting how it is still a key area of demand, as more people realise the opportunity that it offers.

Since the change in planning legislation a few years ago, the purposes for a refurbishment are extensive, and bridging can be the flexible solution that enables it to happen.

We have also seen an increase in applications involving renovation and refurbishment and this trend is likely to continue in 2018.

These industry figures also illustrate how a one size fits all approach and offering is a thing of the past.

Bespoke and flexible financing is the future, particularly during times of uncertainty, so it is crucial that we as an industry are fully prepared with diverse financing options.

Market moves are continuing to present the bridging market with opportunities and we must continue to capitalise on these going forwards.

The fact that the drop which followed the referendum quickly recovered highlights the market’s resilience and reiterates how it is well placed to take advantage of any future economic fluctuations due to its adaptable nature and diverse offering.

The sector has seen a five-fold growth in lending since 2011, and the low interest rate environment means an increasing number of borrowers will turn to alternative funding options.

Well-funded players in the market, particularly principal lenders who are able to cater for complex cases and can provide quick turnarounds, will ultimately thrive.

Source: Mortgage Introducer

Marketing No Comments

Rise of 115% in numbers applying for a short-term loan to pay their mortgage of rent

THE number of people in the UK turning to short-term loans to cover their rent or mortgage has more than doubled, according to new statistics.

In the past two years the number of people applying for short-term credit who said they needed help paying for their accommodation increased by 115 per cent.

New data from FCA authorised credit broker CashLady found the total number of people applying for loans has also nearly doubled since 2015, with a 93 per cent increase in volume.

As well as the number of loan applications rising, the average loan amount requested by those struggling in the UK has increased by 45 per cent from £224 in 2015 to £325 this year. The statistics from CashLady come just weeks after the Financial Conduct Authority revealed that one in six people in the UK (17 per cent) would struggle to pay their mortgage or rent if it increased by just £50.

Earlier this month, the Bank of England’s Monetary Policy Committee announced it would increase interest rates for the first time in ten years — from 0.25 per cent to 0.5 per cent.

Figures also revealed that NHS workers still top the list of employees who most require emergency financial help.

They are followed by supermarket staff from Tesco, Asda and Sainsbury’s. Struggling members of the armed forces also make up the top five workforces requesting loans.

Managing director of CashLady, Chris Hackett, said being able to keep a roof over your head is “a basic human right.”

He added: “These figures, uncomfortable as they are, lay bare the state of the nation as people are struggling to cover their rent or mortgage payments.

“Wages for some of our most valuable members of society are just not high enough for them to manage basic living costs and they are regularly being forced to seek out short-term financial help.

“Housing expenditure is the largest monthly expense for our customers and they should be able to comfortably afford this before turning to emergency finance.

“We act as a broker for short term credit to help our customers find financial assistance from FCA authorised credit providers instead of seeking out illegal or potentially dangerous alternatives.”

The CashLady figures have been released after Chancellor Philip Hammond was accused of leaving ‘ordinary’ Brits out of yesterday’s budget, by failing to mention a wage boost for public sector workers, despite claiming to “support our key public services.”

Source: The National

Marketing No Comments

Short-term lending industry shows increased consumer confidence

The highly controversial high-cost short-term (HCST) credit industry has seen a huge increase in consumer confidence in the UK.

The high cost loans, otherwise known as payday loans used for emergency purposes, have always been subject to huge criticism from the press and MPs. In particular, payday giant Wonga was once accused of “usury” for facilitating loans with an APR of over 6,000 per cent. However, following new regulation, the industry has seen a dramatic change in transparency and consumer confidence.

The introduction of FCA

The Financial Conduct Authority took over as the main regulator for consumer credit in 2014, officially launching in January 2015.

One of its first changes was to ensure that all lenders and brokers trading in the payday sector were fully authorised and fit to carry out regulated activity. Companies were granted “interim permission” whilst applications were being processed, with most companies taking around 12 months to become fully authorised – such as QuickQuid, Peachy and Uncle Buck.

The rigorous process managed to remove more than half of the companies offering high-cost short-term loans from the industry – allowing only the most compliant to survive.

The role of authorisation has significantly de-powered the role of brokers in the industry, who until this point had been regularly capturing data and re-selling it multiple times for profit. Prior to 2015, it was unclear for many consumers which website was a lender or broker, hence many applicants would fall victim to their details being sent to hundreds of companies, bombarded by text messages and phone calls and in several cases, upfront fees being taken out as a cover for “admin fees”.

This led to the payday industry receiving over 10,000 complaints between Jan and March 2014. But since the introduction of FCA regulation, the process of brokers selling data has diminished significantly.

The price cap

In addition, the FCA the introduced a price cap for the payday industry to limit the amount that lenders could charge. This capped daily interest at 0.8 per cent, equal to £24 per £100 borrowing and meaning that customers would never repay double the amount they asked to borrow. This resulted in several more companies leaving the industry, deeming that the margins were no longer “commercially viable”. A price cap on default charges was also established, limited to a one-off fee of £15.

One function of the price cap was to encourage new competitors in the market to compete over other factors such as even lower rates, flexible product offerings and customer service.


All lenders were required by the new FCA regulation to carry out full credit and affordability checks prior to funding a loan. This indicates that lenders have to prove that a borrower can afford to repay without falling into financial difficulty. The role of underwriting was somewhat loose previous to FCA – with several loans granted by lenders in an attempt to increase profits by extending loans and triggering late fees. In fact, several large lenders were fined millions of pounds for failing to demonstrate adequate checks. Wonga was fined over £200m in October 2014 and QuickQuid fined £1.4m in November 2015.

However, with strict checks now a requirement, there is an emphasis on only giving loans to those that can afford it. The downside is that less and less people will be approved for loans as lenders become more restrictive. Wonga notoriously cut its number of approved loans from one million in 2014 to 550,000 in 2015.

Transparency through comparison websites

In an attempt to increase transparency of prices, all lenders are now required by the FCA to include a link to a comparison website clearly on the website homepage. This should allow the user to see clear comparison tables and compare the rates of that lender against other competitors. Leading comparison sites in this industry include, All The Lenders and Quiddi Compare.

How consumer confidence has increased

The role of regulation has significantly increased consumer confidence for those looking for a high cost loan.

As we approach the three-year anniversary of the FCA’s regulation in the industry, we see that applicants have a much better idea of what lenders charge, without fear of very high costs or their personal details being sent to numerous companies and fees being taken out for no reason.

This has been emphasised by the number of people searching for payday related products on Google and the topic being mentioned considerably less in the press.

In addition, a recent review by the FCA of its price cap indicated that it was “happy” with how it was being conducted and how there were overall significantly less complaints in the industry. The price cap and regulation for the high-cost short-term credit industry will not be reviewed again until 2020.

Source: Real Business

Marketing No Comments

Chain-break: How you can STILL buy if your sale falls through

PICTURE the scene. You’re moving home, and you’re in a chain. That is to say, you’re selling to someone who’s selling to someone else. The deal is days away from exchange, and then you get the phone call. The estate agent telling you that your buyer is having to withdraw from the transaction.

Your first thought is that you’re going to lose the dream home that you’re currently trying to buy.

Your second thought is the amount of money you’ve racked up so far on solicitor’s costs and surveyor’s fees that you’re about to lose.

Believe it or not, on average currently one in three chain-based transactions fall through in the UK, and although the reasons why vary, the consequences are normally always stressful and expensive.

So, if this happens to you, what are the options available if you still need to move and don’t want to miss out on the property that you’re aiming to buy?

Firstly, it may be possible to keep the property that you were going to sell, remortgage it to release enough equity to make your onward purchase, and then keep it and let it out.

This course of action makes you a landlord, albeit an accidental one.

It’s is a common way to deal with such a problem, particularly in areas where there is high demand for rental housing.

If this route appeals, you’ll need to get professional mortgage advice to ensure that the numbers stack up, and that you have the correct mortgage in place for both properties.

It’s not a cheap solution, as you also need to bear in mind that if you’re keeping your existing home and letting it out, then you’ll pay an additional 3% of Stamp Duty and Land Tax on the property that you’re buying.

You’ll also need to ensure that you understand the ramifications of the additional income tax you’ll pay on any rental income on the property you’re letting out.

However, for some people whose individual circumstances mean that they need to move quickly, this can be a reasonable solution, although one which requires significant research to ensure that you understand fully what you’re letting yourself in for and how much it’s going to cost you, both in the long term and the short term.

Another option is to take out a bridging loan.

This is typically a short-term funding option, used to ‘bridge’ the gap between when you need money to purchase a property, and when you’ll receive funds on the property that you’re selling.

A bridging loan can be a very useful solution to help facilitate a transaction that otherwise wouldn’t be able to move forward, for example if a chain falls apart.

However, there are a couple of things that are important to consider.

Bridging finance is basically a short-term loan offered at a high rate of interest, which can make it an expensive option.

Secondly, you need to be really confident that your sale is going to go through, because the money is advanced to you so that you can make your onward purchase on the basis that you’ll be paying it back in full within a very short timescale, usually a couple of weeks.

A typical bridging loan is based on 1% interest per month on the total amount that you’ve borrowed, and you’ll need to have an exit plan, in other words evidence how you’re going to repay the loan and when, in order to be considered for this particular type of finance.

The other thing to be aware of is that bridging loans aren’t regulated the same way that normal, mainstream mortgages are.

So, if this is an option you’re considering it’s really important that you receive expert, professional advice from a broker who can review a range of bridging loan products for you, to ensure that the bridging finance company are reputable and that you fully understand all the fees you may be charged and how the interest on the amount you’re borrowing is being calculated.

As Brian Murphy, Head of Lending for Mortgage Advice Bureau whose best buy mortgages for home movers have been released today explains, “Being involved in a transaction where a chain breaks down can be exceptionally stressful, but there are options available to help you progress your move.

“If you decide to let out your existing property and need to remortgage to release equity in order to help fund your onward purchase, it’s likely that you’ll need a specific Let to Buy mortgage, which is a slightly different product to a typical Buy To Let mortgage.

“If you’re going to raise bridging finance, it’s essential that you get professional advice, as you’ll need permission from your existing mortgage lender to do so.

Either way, it’s crucial that you are totally comfortable with the financial implications of whatever course of action you decide, and that you can afford all the fees and repayments and additional Stamp Duty, if it’s due, before you continue.”

A third option is to sell your existing home to an investor who specialises in buying properties quickly, in order to free up your cash so that you can proceed with your sale.

Typically, if you’re using this kind of service, you’ll be offered a price that is well below the market value for your property (or BMV as its known in the property industry) for example probably only 75% or 80% of what it’s worth, but they will facilitate a transaction quickly.

Historically, this has meant that this route has really only been used by those who are desperate as a last resort, due to the amount of equity lost as a result of such a transaction.

However, there is now a welcome alternative to the typical BMV investor model.

Nested, who are a new entrant to the market, offer to guarantee up to 97% of the market value, with the additional upside that a further amount is payable to the seller if Nested are able to sell the property at or above the agreed valuation.

If the property sells at under the value guaranteed, Nested make up the shortfall, not the seller.

Nested was launched in January 2017, and don’t class themselves as a BMV investor, rather an ‘ethical estate agent who is able to guarantee that they will sell your home’.

So far, the company has successfully sold over £400million of property, enabling their clients to sell their current home quickly in order to buy another, or assist those who have been in a failed chain to complete their purchase when they’ve lost a buyer.

The cost for using the Nested service is a fixed fee of 1.5% of the selling price of the property, which is very similar to what many normal estate agents would charge, although of course the crucial difference is that Nested guarantee to sell the property once the valuation has been agreed.

There is an additional fee of up to 1.5% if the guaranteed valuation is exceeded when Nested sell the property.

The service currently operates within the M25 and covers Greater London, however the company are rolling out nationally early in 2018.

So, if you receive that phone call from the agent telling you that your buyer has pulled out, don’t panic.

There are options available. Yes, it’s awful when life throws a curve-ball like this but, by taking appropriate professional advice and researching your options thoroughly, it’s still very possible to proceed with buying that home you’ve set your heart on.  Just take a deep breath and, as the saying goes, keep calm and carry on.

Source: Express

Marketing No Comments

How & why short-term business loans make sense for experienced entrepreneurs

Many business loans are substantial, long-term commitments that come with a mountain of paperwork to wade through and complicated lending terms that are foreboding for business owners that only need a reasonable amount of extra money for a limited period.

While long-term business lending is intended to cover expansion requirements, buying out a competitor or for another critical need, short-term business loans are suitable for businesses that have some immediate expenses or ones that are upcoming over the next few months. The typical shorter loan period is repayable over a 12-month period, although there are some that run longer than this to provide a bit more time to repay.

Which Businesses Can Access a Short-term?

In this first instance, short-term business loans are available to UK businesses registered as a limited company, operate as a sole trader, or as an incorporated partnership. For companies, they must be registered with Companies House as a UK company with its company filings being up-to-date.

Most lenders will want to see at least one year of business operations (often longer), with the most recent yearly statutory accounts filed with Companies House confirming a 12-month turnover that exceeded £100,000. While a short-term business loan is often unsecured, being a homeowner is usually a plus. The debt obligations of the business must be manageable at their current levels – preferably with a good deal of slack to afford the additional repayments of a short-term loan – and the director shouldn’t have any outstanding creditors from a previous business either.

See for a guide on the application specifics for small business owners looking for short-term funding.

How Much Can Be Borrowed?

The maximum loan amount depends on the lender’s policies and loan criteria. A business that’s only been operating a year with limited profitability will not be offered as much as a more established business with a million-pound turnover and six-figure profitability every year.

Short-term small business loans fall between the £3,000 and £150,000 range, which keeps the repayments reasonable and the total interest and closing costs affordable.

Best Uses of a Short-term Business Loan

Managing the demanding cash flow requirements of a company is tricky. There are times accountants make a mistake or omit some important upcoming expenses, which leaves an unexpected hole in the accounts that must be filled. It’s a situation that usually can be traded out of using future profits to fill in the hole where the miscalculation was made, but in the meantime, the company faces the likelihood of running below a zero balance until they can recover. To ensure they can keep trading profitably, a short-term loan is a useful, structured way to deal with the issue rather than using an overdraft facility that often seems to work like quicksand; the more you use it, the deeper you sink.

A lower than expected seasonal sales season can cause a problem with balancing the books through the worst periods of the year. With a company that is showing positive signs of sales growth the rest of the year but is suffering through their usual seasonal dry spell, a short-term facility makes sense to survive the period and use upcoming profits to pay off the loan a few months’ later.

Expanding staff or larger facilities to handle a surge in business where the cash flow drags behind the gross sales is another area where a long-term lending facility won’t make much sense, but a 12-month one certainly does. Having enough staff on-hand improves morale while the business is under strain from rapid expansion. Similarly, opening an annex or taking over the next-door office helps to manage staff numbers ahead of the rise in profitability.

When Is the Wrong Time to Take Out a Short-term Loan?

Taking out a short-term loan for a business that’s declining isn’t the smartest move. There’s no telling whether the sales decline is going to continue when it’s not due to known seasonality reasons. It is best to survey the customers (especially the ones not buying the product or service) to determine what is causing them to pass on your offer? Then fix the problem.

A company that is perennially short of working capital won’t benefit much from a short-term facility because unless the fortunes of the business improve in the short-term too, it will be ill-equipped to repay the loan in time. Taking out a new lending facility to repay the first one won’t work like it does with a credit card minimum payment because short-term loans are not necessarily paid in full all on the back-end.

There should always be sound, well-considered reasons for taking out any lending facility. Otherwise, it’s an expensive way to meander along in a business being unsure what to do with the extra cash. More money and no plan surely are a bad idea, especially for a company that will need to repay the loan, plus interest, inside of a year or less. Borrowing prudently is the best idea.

Source: BM Magazine

Marketing No Comments

Bridging loans on the rise amid tougher lender criteria – MTF

Brokers have reported a jump in bridging loans volume, as borrowers struggle to secure mortgages from mainstream lenders, according to research.

Almost two-thirds of brokers reported a rise in bridging volumes in the third quarter of 2017, up from under half in the three months previously, a survey by lender MTF showed.

It comes as borrowers are hit by tougher restrictions from mainstream lenders, MTF said.

The regional spread of demand for bridging loans has also widened, with more demand in Scotland and Northern Ireland, according to the survey.

Overall, the South East was found to have the biggest demand for bridging loans, followed by London.

Development projects and business purposes are the most popular reasons for taking out bridging loans, accounting for 30% and 17% respectively.

The bridging loan process took longer than it did 12 months ago, according to two-thirds of brokers surveyed.

More than half said completion took more than three weeks and fewer than one in five reported the process as between one and two weeks.

Speed is of the essence

Almost three-quarters of brokers surveyed blamed solicitors as the main reason for delay, with the value also causing problems for around one in ten.

James Anderson, head of new business at MTF, said: “Bridging loans remain an important financial tool for borrowers and demand continues to grow.

“Speed has always been a vital element in bridging finance and it is important that solicitors understand what is required, so that bridging finance requests can be completed as quickly and accurately as possible.

“There are some excellent firms of solicitors to choose from and many bridging loan lenders, like MTF, use a panel of pre-approved firms to help speed up a bridging loan transaction for the applicant.”

Source: Mortgage Solutions

Marketing No Comments

UK bridging finance hits pre-Brexit high

Bridging finance provider West One’s latest index, released on Tuesday, showed that gross annualised lending increased from £4.3bn in the second quarter to £4.7bn – exceeding 2016’s pre-EU referendum high of £4.4bn.

UK BRIDGING lending rose to a pre-referendum high of £4.7bn in the third quarter, according to new research.

The index, which uses the company’s data as well as statistics published by the Association of Bridging Professionals and other UK bridging loan providers, also found that the emerging trend of smaller transaction sizes had continued into the third quarter.

Average loan sizes within the bridging finance sector dropped below £600,000, compared to averages above £900,000 at the same time last year.

Read more: Assetz appoints LendInvest’s Damien Druce for intermediary expansion

This reflects the relatively depressed market for high-end properties with values over £1m, particularly in London, West One said.

However, there has been a large volume of smaller transactions, meaning that total lending held up well in the third quarter as the figures show.

West One predicts a further rise in bridging rates in the fourth quarter, although the sector remains highly competitive.

Read more: Funding Circle borrowers back joining European Free Trade Agreement post-Brexit

“The bridging sector has performed well during the third quarter, despite the backdrop of concern around the progress of Brexit negotiations, and economic indicators pointing to both a slower economy and to the interest rate rise that ultimately came in November,” said Danny Waters, chief executive of West One’s parent company Enra Group.

“Whatever happens next, the industry must continue to adapt to conditions, and provide the diverse and flexible funding options that property professionals need, so they can take advantage of the changing, regional landscape that we are seeing develop.”

Read more: Want to invest in property? Then take a look at these peer-to-peer platforms

Source: P2P Finance News

Marketing No Comments

65% of brokers report bridging loan volume increase

Almost two-thirds of brokers (65%) have noticed an increase in bridging loan volume in Q3 2017, a rise on the 48% who reported growth during Q2 2017, according to recent research.

The latest broker sentiment survey conducted by bridging lender MTF has revealed that bridging finance continues to assist borrowers who are struggling to obtain loans from mainstream lenders which have introduced tougher lending restrictions.

The geographical spread of bridging loan demand has also expanded in the third quarter, and for the first time 9% of the 96 brokers surveyed highlighted an increase in demand in Scotland and Northern Ireland.

The South East witnessed the biggest demand for bridging loans in the UK (48%) for the fourth consecutive quarter, although this represented a decline from the 62% registered in Q2.

The second highest area for demand was London at 25%.

Funding development projects was the most popular reason for obtaining a bridging loan (30%) for the fourth consecutive quarter, followed by business purposes (17%).

Some 69% of brokers claimed the bridging loan process took longer than it did 12 months ago, while 45% said it took less than three weeks to complete such a loan.

Almost a fifth (18%) cited a duration period of just one to two weeks, while 55% said it took in excess of three weeks.

James Anderson, head of new business at MTF, said: “Bridging loans remain an important financial tool for borrowers and demand continues to grow.

“Speed has always been a vital element in bridging finance and it is important that solicitors understand what is required, so that bridging finance requests can be completed as quickly and accurately as possible.

“There are some excellent firms of solicitors to choose from and many bridging loan lenders, like MTF, use a panel of pre-approved firms to help speed up a bridging loan transaction for the applicant.”

Source: Bridging and Commercial